<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email linking to PDF &#8211; what are B&amp;T thinking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinemarketingstuff.com.au/2008/02/19/email-linking-to-pdf-what-are-bt-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinemarketingstuff.com.au/2008/02/19/email-linking-to-pdf-what-are-bt-thinking/</link>
	<description>Diary of an Australian web start up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingstuff.com.au/2008/02/19/email-linking-to-pdf-what-are-bt-thinking/#comment-7865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingstuff.wordpress.com/?p=179#comment-7865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Louisa,

I would agree it is a poor practise to replace linking to a website article with linking to a PDF. When they have previously been posting the full article on their site anyway, how does it benefit them to create a PDF?

Having the full article on the website with a link on that page to download in PDF form would be far more useful. Search engines would do a better job of pulling up the article on a webpage in their results than the contents of a PDF well.

David
Digicon - http://www.digicon.com.au]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Louisa,</p>
<p>I would agree it is a poor practise to replace linking to a website article with linking to a PDF. When they have previously been posting the full article on their site anyway, how does it benefit them to create a PDF?</p>
<p>Having the full article on the website with a link on that page to download in PDF form would be far more useful. Search engines would do a better job of pulling up the article on a webpage in their results than the contents of a PDF well.</p>
<p>David<br />
Digicon &#8211; <a href="http://www.digicon.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.digicon.com.au</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Garber</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingstuff.com.au/2008/02/19/email-linking-to-pdf-what-are-bt-thinking/#comment-7846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Garber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingstuff.wordpress.com/?p=179#comment-7846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Louisa

Interesting post - I noticed the B&amp;T change recently and have been pondering it.

I usually don&#039;t like click throughs in an email that go to PDFs but I think in this case it actually works.

The PDF goes through to a succinct 1-2 page easily scannable pdf - I have noticed a trend to one page succinct websites and emails.  

Would be interested in other opinions.

Kevin
Melon Media - http://www.melon.com.au]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Louisa</p>
<p>Interesting post &#8211; I noticed the B&amp;T change recently and have been pondering it.</p>
<p>I usually don&#8217;t like click throughs in an email that go to PDFs but I think in this case it actually works.</p>
<p>The PDF goes through to a succinct 1-2 page easily scannable pdf &#8211; I have noticed a trend to one page succinct websites and emails.  </p>
<p>Would be interested in other opinions.</p>
<p>Kevin<br />
Melon Media &#8211; <a href="http://www.melon.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.melon.com.au</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

